tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-189475652024-03-14T01:28:33.137+08:00beautiful samarbeautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18947565.post-62950529763653614362014-02-18T13:15:00.000+08:002014-02-18T13:20:57.942+08:00Scenes of Eastern Samar after Yolanda<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeUuGhXXZXIbbglCii7I_dOEJRrhKBq54kErcyS8whX4FcYGZf41p16CfG_hnLSHvtDPIObuSdV5tvCIRobfwVLyaUwkZO-AyVaTSSoVXmKmJIhcCZ5PhUMz-vDKbkiTmtQjUk/s1600/04.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgeUuGhXXZXIbbglCii7I_dOEJRrhKBq54kErcyS8whX4FcYGZf41p16CfG_hnLSHvtDPIObuSdV5tvCIRobfwVLyaUwkZO-AyVaTSSoVXmKmJIhcCZ5PhUMz-vDKbkiTmtQjUk/s1600/04.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
A dilapidated house seems what remains of one of the coastal barangay of Hernani, Eastern Samar<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhrdn2jXOUwoH29PpeqbSMgA6MAgxtGVvUfcdJ3UblEQHghvQGXKXaM7q_J8wfFSnxMAZNGDWDdPKuWd6mGaEXzP_YxV0hEGpGVZyqwlLyd7U3gNwlMpj6hMKJM7ngiNuw6Onxz/s1600/03.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhrdn2jXOUwoH29PpeqbSMgA6MAgxtGVvUfcdJ3UblEQHghvQGXKXaM7q_J8wfFSnxMAZNGDWDdPKuWd6mGaEXzP_YxV0hEGpGVZyqwlLyd7U3gNwlMpj6hMKJM7ngiNuw6Onxz/s1600/03.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
Rubles, rubles are all there are in a barangay in Hernani, Estern Samar.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjCB-oL0niumlqnxUfo6rDl4n1VYFnJUL6e4i_ehdwixGhPXLGeoy5tOLKlvOsScwYC1xrhq0mK4yA9f-kD0Hn7ndn8ReJBkeBGTGNZPMz9dXDAUEuL1kCnCNoK00vONb1ryQm/s1600/05.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjCB-oL0niumlqnxUfo6rDl4n1VYFnJUL6e4i_ehdwixGhPXLGeoy5tOLKlvOsScwYC1xrhq0mK4yA9f-kD0Hn7ndn8ReJBkeBGTGNZPMz9dXDAUEuL1kCnCNoK00vONb1ryQm/s1600/05.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
This was what the people of Salcedo were saying weeks following the super typhoon Yolanda<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-uApIdM9rjEAt-fwVubggPzQo1mw6p-UszDZ8y74s2EfkBDT_xM5VMMdVULx5QtsJPUlUTqHohR6E3Txk7Im_u05sn3NK41Pt8fYodSMbxfPumzLZgyN4oDyVJ18d5SKefB-T/s1600/06.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-uApIdM9rjEAt-fwVubggPzQo1mw6p-UszDZ8y74s2EfkBDT_xM5VMMdVULx5QtsJPUlUTqHohR6E3Txk7Im_u05sn3NK41Pt8fYodSMbxfPumzLZgyN4oDyVJ18d5SKefB-T/s1600/06.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWrMkK6dlNz_7JU9jbUddL1mpbjbhI8PDucJ9UEJcauyQJr120ZbdvFcshEx8RZdwvRp1zjRnYjIysqUtV7crDMh0NcXXPYBgXuY0kG-03Nnt2XTFwB7-sfufoU7XNymw9Ymes/s1600/02.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiWrMkK6dlNz_7JU9jbUddL1mpbjbhI8PDucJ9UEJcauyQJr120ZbdvFcshEx8RZdwvRp1zjRnYjIysqUtV7crDMh0NcXXPYBgXuY0kG-03Nnt2XTFwB7-sfufoU7XNymw9Ymes/s1600/02.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
This is what remained of the heritage Church of Guiuan, Eastern Samar.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLlXdKxIQf6YUzoBAQOSY4gS_LgYJJTAMdJNKQ4JwkVHrrLSTPPNe27gbq74HAV_gDVHRmH1lF_0fWLIGe4IRwl0rvlQ4JkMYMq2asuioV6RY8SaVbygvxqXWa-LzjtHnBXdgw/s1600/01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgLlXdKxIQf6YUzoBAQOSY4gS_LgYJJTAMdJNKQ4JwkVHrrLSTPPNe27gbq74HAV_gDVHRmH1lF_0fWLIGe4IRwl0rvlQ4JkMYMq2asuioV6RY8SaVbygvxqXWa-LzjtHnBXdgw/s1600/01.jpg" height="212" width="320" /></a></div>
Bishop Crispin Varquez inspects, or mourns, of what remained of the rectory of Guiuan.beautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18947565.post-52839815207909966282009-02-18T10:58:00.002+08:002009-02-18T11:03:48.780+08:00As I See It<br /><br /><strong>The ‘hellish roads’ of Eastern Samar</strong><br /><br />By Neal Cruz<br /><br /><em>Philippine Daily InquirerFirst </em><br /><em>Posted 00:59:00 02/11/2009</em><br /><br />In the wake of the exposé about collusion and rigging by contractors and public officials of biddings for road projects funded by the World Bank comes the news of a thousand angry people in Eastern Samar province protesting the non-rehabilitation of a “hellish road” in the province, the main artery of Eastern Samar that link it to the Philippines-Japan national highway. Aside from a protest demonstration, they signed a petition demanding the immediate repair and rehabilitation of their highways and other national roads.<br /><br />To say that Eastern Samar’s roads are littered with potholes is an understatement. As the photographs show, there are vast craters that sometimes make portions of roads virtually impassable. Some portions of the highway are planted with young coconut trees as a show of protest. Some craters are knee-deep and threaten the safety of motorists passing through these roads. Because these are national roads, the national government, through the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), is responsible for maintaining them.<br /><br />What is the problem? It is not lack of funds. It is a case of wrong priorities. It is misuse of government funds. The roads remain in bad shape despite the heavy infusion of national government funds — via the DPWH’s regular budget, plus the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF)) and congressional insertions or initiative allocations (CI).<br /><br />But judging from the terrible state of Eastern Samar’s roads, it would not be wrong to conclude that much of these multi-billion funds actually ended up in the pockets of the proponents. The reason for the deplorable state of some national highways, such as those in Eastern Samar is, in one word, “corruption.”<br /><br />What anybody brave enough to traverse the province’s roads will see is that in the midst of the thousand and one potholes are many new road signs. Isn’t that strange? Records show that some P90 million in government funds have been spent on directional signs and traffic posts even before the roads could be built or re-paved. It’s a sin to procure these traffic signs, guardrails and posts when the money used to acquire and install them could have been better used to rehabilitate portions of Eastern Samar’s roads.<br /><br />But instead of allocating funds for road improvements, the DPWH District Office, which is controlled by Rep. Teodulo Coquilla purchased road signs for road sections full of potholes. It is weird to see spanking new traffic signs and shiny guardrails on roads that look like they have been abandoned for decades.<br /><br />Records show that these road signage projects include the installation of 181 pieces of road signs and two pieces of billboards that cost P4.78 million at the Camp-Junction Taft-Borongan road section and 358 pieces of traffic control posts at the same road section costing P4.679 million.<br /><br />P4.65 million worth of guardrails and posts was also purchased for the Junction Taft-San Juan Road and another set also worth P4.65 million for the Borongan-Llorente Road. The DPWH District Office also bought the same set of materials for the same amount for the Oras-Arteche National Road.<br /><br />Guardrails and posts were also installed at the San Julian-Borongan road section and at the Llorente-Junction Buenavista road to the tune of P4.65 million for each section. More than P10 million was spent by the DPWH for directional signs and highway traffic control posts for the Junction Taft-Oras National Road and Junction Taft-Dolores-San Eduardo sections.<br /><br />The same sets of materials worth P4.67 million for each road section were also acquired for the Lawaan-Giporlos National Road; Buenavista-Guiuan and the Giporlos-Junction Buenavista National Road. At the Borongan-Guiuan Road section, 182 pieces of road signs were purchased for P4.81 million.<br /><br />As if these wasteful expenditures were not enough, another P30 million was spent on more road signs and guardrails during the October-December 2008 period alone in the Buenavista-Malabag and Buenavista-Lawaan-Marabut sections.<br /><br />On top of purchasing these traffic signs and devices, there are also reports about the profusion of ghost road projects in the province.<br /><br />Fed up with this sad state of affairs, the Sangguniang Panlalawigan [Provincial Board], the Provincial Development Council, and the Provincial Disaster Coordinating Council passed separate resolutions in June last year asking or authorizing the provincial governor to help in the improvement and rehabilitation of the national roads.<br /><br />In a parallel move, Gov. Ben Evardone wrote the DPWH District Office twice last year asking permission to allow the province to help in the rehabilitation work with an initial budget of P10 million.<br /><br />But according to Evardone, the DPWH did not act on his letters. This is strange because the provincial government can do the repair work, considering that it has its own pool of equipment for the purpose, plus the initial fund approved by the Sangguniang Panlalawigan.<br /><br />Why did the DPWH refuse help from the government of the province where it obviously needs all the help it can get to fix the mess of the national roads? The answer lies in a rumor in the provincial capital of Borongan that the DPWH is sitting on the offer of Evardone on the say-so of a congressman who is afraid that the governor will get the credit for the road rehabilitation.<br /><br />Finally, the people of Eastern Samar are asking where the P1.3 million monthly maintenance fund, or P16 million a year, is being spent. During an investigation by the Sanggunian, a DPWH engineer admitted that part of the fund is being used to pay the salaries of casual employees of the district office of a congressman.<br /><br />Will the DPWH main office please do something about this?beautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18947565.post-85575216574485891902008-12-02T23:09:00.001+08:002008-12-02T23:11:38.800+08:00<strong>Small-Scale Mining—A Looming Menace to Salcedo, Eastern Samar</strong><br /><br />By Maria Cadahia Perez<br /><br />WORKING as volunteers in Natural Resource Management (NRM) and Sustainable Development Planning in Salcedo, Eastern Samar in the Philippines, we found it incredible and frustrating to witness the demonstrated threat of small-scale mining making strides as an alternative livelihood to locals while at the same time pushing the sustainability of the natural resource base and the welfare of the population to the shadow of uncertainty. <br /><br />Salcedo, is a small, rural, 5th class municipality on a scale of 1 (most developed) to 6 (the least developed). People’s livelihood depends mainly on natural resources in coastal and upland areas where farming and fishing are the dominant activities. The natural environment of Salcedo has been continually degraded through the years by deforestation and unsustainable agro-forestry practices in the upland areas and over-exploitation and destructive fishing practices along the coast. All these together with demographic increase have resulted to dwindling local people’s incomes and poor standards of living. The Local Government Unit (LGU) has been inadequately equipped to respond to this challenge and since the last five years, has been supported by technical assistance from international volunteers who specialize in NRM. <br /><br />But the technical support provided by the international volunteers and their partner organizations to enhance the lives of the local population and reverse the negative trends threatening the environment and progress of the municipality, seems to have been set aside as the Eastern Samar provincial government and its constituent municipal governments started facilitating small-scale mining to “address the needs of development.”<br /><br />In 2007, the provincial government of Eastern Samar issued an ordinance setting aside sizeable portions of land exclusively to small-scale mining. In the municipality of Salcedo, the provincial law set aside around 2,853 hectares for small-scale chromite mining. At the same time, the Mines and GeoSciences Bureau (MGB) is processing an application for an offshore nickel and iron mining exploration permit in the ecologically important Matarinao Bay which is a breeding/spawning ground for marine life and an important fishing area to hundreds of coastal families in the municipalities of Hernani, MacArthur, Quinapondan and Salcedo.<br />Is mining really the appropriate development strategy, or is it just being pushed for the enrichment of the few? In the context of this small community, the popular answer given by residents seems to be the latter. <br /><br /><em><strong>Irregularities<br /></strong></em>In Salcedo, there is now an alarming increase in the number of small scale mining operations (about 20 pockets of small scale mining at the very least) particularly in the southern barangays where a lot of irregularities are now being committed which put into question the desirability of the mining operations. We conducted field surveys of the mining areas in various months of 2008 and found a lot of irregularities and violations of the law such as: the use of child labor, employment of heavy equipment, burning of forests, and stockpiling of chromite deposits 20 meters away from mangrove and seaside areas, among others. <br /><br />The mining operators are also conducting a misinformation campaign to trick local officials and residents to believe that the activity would benefit agriculture since it would result to the removal of chromite which is a toxic substance in the soil. However, the same misinformation campaign does not explain that mining would involve the excavation of the soil which, if done haphazardly, as it is being done by the mining operators, would result to the disruption of the soil structure and water infiltration capacity, as well as erosion and leaching of nutrients which, when added all together, would render the soil unsuitable to agriculture. <br /><br />Due to the inherently destructive nature of mining and the fact that at this early stage, a number of abuses are already being committed by the mining operators, further livelihood, health and environmental problems would arise which in the long run could create more damages than gains. This is especially so since the number of small-scale mining operations in the municipality are expected to increase dramatically and cover various parts of 2,853 hectare mining block, as had happened in many parts of the country where sizeable chunks of land have been declared for small scale mining. It is therefore imperative that the people and the local (provincial, municipal and barangay) government units be informed, organized and equipped to properly evaluate, monitor, regulate, control or even stop the activity if need be.<br /><br /><strong><em>Environmental and social damages</em></strong><br />For sure, the mining operation would bring immediate gains such as employment and increased income from a few to possibly hundreds of families if the mines would operate for years, and also increased LGU revenues from fees and tax collections that could range from a few hundred thousands to a few million pesos a year if a lot of miners would operate in the large tract of land that paradoxically, has been allocated to small scale mining. <br /><br />However, all these projected benefits should be weighed against the possible adverse effects which include an alarmingly huge number of interconnected environmental and social damages. The negative environmental effects include the following: 1) permanent loss or disruption of natural habitat through the conversion of forest and agricultural areas to mining land, 2) loss of soil through excavation which would result to the disruption of soil structure and function and the consequent decline in soil fertility, and accelerated erosion due to removal of vegetation 3) contamination and disruption of flow of ground and surface water due to damage to the soil’s water infiltration and absorption capacity, release of mine tailings and sedimentation 4) reduced slope stability and higher risk of landslides and environmental catastrophes particularly in Barangay Palanas which is prone to geologic hazards as per 2006 Mines and GeoSciences Bureau (MGB) Rapid Field Assessment, 5) loss of biodiversity, 6) further disruption of off-site or downstream land and water (fishing/spawning) areas including streams, mangroves, sea grass beds and corals, particularly in Leyte Gulf, and possibly even Matarinao and Quinapondan bays, due to the fact that the mining area covers the municipality’s three critical watersheds.<br /><br />Social damages or the direct negative impacts of mining to the people include the following: 1) loss of agricultural and forest based livelihood and decline in farm yield and fish harvest due to degradation of habitat, 2) displacement of households due to damage to environment and livelihood on and off-site, 3) restricted entry to hunters, food gatherers and shifting cultivators, 4) reduced water availability for domestic consumption and irrigation due to contamination and disruption of ground and surface water, 5)immediate illnesses and long-term adverse health effects (such as lung infection, skin allergy, poisoning, among others) not only from inhalation and skin contact, but also through the entry of large amounts of chromite into the food chain and water supply system, 6) lesser recreational resources and activities, and finally, 7) decline in long-term income and exacerbation of the poverty cycle situation due to the synergistic interplay of all the negative consequences cited above.<br /><br /><strong><em>Need for assessment</em></strong><br />Ideally, a thorough cost and benefit analysis should be undertaken to carefully and accurately assess the pros and cons and provide sufficient information to guide the people and decision makers on the issue. However, even with the limited information available, it is already clear that small scale mining would grossly be more of a bane than a boon to Salcedo. This would be evident if we consider the fact that the 2,852.89 hectares set aside by the provincial government exclusively to small-scale mining covers 24% or about a quarter of the total land area of the municipality.<br /><br />If this declared area would be peppered with or subjected to numerous small scale mining operations, then it would certainly destroy the environment and resource base of nearly half of the municipality as the impact area covers not only the declared block of mining land, but also covers the downstream and coastal areas. If small scale miners would fully operate in the area, perhaps 3 to 10% (90 to 300) of the more than 3,000 households or families in the municipality would benefit temporarily in the short and medium term from employment and increased income, but about 30 to 40% (900 to 1,200) of the total households/families of the municipality, including the downstream and coastal communities in the nearby towns of Quinapondan, Gen. MacArthur, and even Hernani and Mercedes would have their livelihoods disrupted or destroyed, since the mining area covers three major watersheds and impacts from mine tailings would reach the important fishing grounds such as Leyte Gulf, Matarinao and Quinapondan bays. All these negative impacts would be felt by those affected not only for a few years but for the entire lifetimes of the present and succeeding generations.<br /><br /><strong><em>The real beneficiaries</em></strong><br />Once again, it would be the outsiders or the mining companies (those organizing the small scale miners) that stand to gain windfall benefits, including perhaps a few politicians and supporters who would strike it rich with grease money from the operations. For instance, in the November 19, 2008 issue of the Daily Tribune, Mr. Ernesto ‘Mr. Expose’ Maceda mentioned that “The Bishop and civil society leaders also decry Governor Evardone’s indiscriminate issuance of small mining permits. The talk around town is that the permits are allegedly issued for a payment of P2 to P3 million each.”<br /><br />All these benefits would be reaped by the few, while majority of the people would be poorer than ever and would be left with limited livelihood options and dwindling income. The windfall beneficiaries would soon disappear after the closure of the mines, and the few million pesos that the LGU would stand to gain from the mining operations would never be enough to pay for the restoration of the soil, habitat and resource base of the municipality. Poverty, environmental degradation, famine, sickness, difficulties in water supply, among others would then prevail in the long term, and Salcedo may partly become a ghost town with a significant portion of its population moving out to find livelihood and salvation elsewhere.<br /> <br />With the foregoing considerations, it is clear that the costs of mining in Salcedo would far outweigh the gains from the activity. It is therefore recommended that the LGU close the mining operations in order to rescue and sustain the life support system and the resource and livelihood base of its constituents.<br /><br /><strong><em>Unconstitutional</em></strong><br />The grounds for closing the mining operations are plenty. First, the provincial ordinance that allocated 2,853 hectares of land “to be exclusively intended for small scale mining” in Salcedo is unconstitutional in that it impinges upon prior rights. The area covers several hundred hectares of Comprehensive Agrarian Reform (CARP) and Community Based Forest Management (CBFM) lands that were awarded years earlier to local communities such as the one in Barangay Caga-ut and neighboring barangays.<br /><br />It also covers hundreds of hectares of very steep sloping lands which are protected by national law, as well as locally declared protection areas such as the Salcedo Community Watershed Management (SALCOWAREM) zone, the communal forests in the vicinity of Barangay Naparaan, and special use areas such as the Eastern Samar State University (ESSU). The constitutionally guaranteed prior rights of stakeholders are in conflict with the intent of the provincial ordinance, and therefore the latter being more recent, should be repealed. <br /><br /><strong><em>Recommendations</em></strong> <br />Aside from the repeal of the provincial ordinance, it is also recommended that measures be undertaken to improve the capacity of provincial, municipal and barangay governments to effectively evaluate mining projects, and to properly plan, monitor and regulate land use in their respective jurisdictions. Local land use plans should clearly identify areas that should be set aside for protection and off-limits to mining.<br /><br />At the regional level, provincial plans should be properly integrated, and priority projects, be it in agriculture, forestry, protection or mining should be clearly identified. The Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) should be an active member of the Regional Development Council and should be very involved in the formulation of the Regional Development Plan, particularly the Regional Physical Framework Plan or Regional Land Use Policy which should likewise, clearly delineate which areas should be set aside for protection and off-limits to mining. And since the Plan would reflect the development agenda for the region as agreed by all sectors, then the processing of mining applications and permits should be made in accordance with it. And as active member and supporter of the Council (RDC), the MGB would no longer have to process mining applications that fall in areas off-limits to mining, and the tensions and conflicts that arise from unplanned development initiatives would be avoided.<br /><br />Lastly, it is recommended that the various levels of government (provincial, municipal and barangay) pass a well coordinated ordinance that would require mining firms to comply with policies and regulations as articulated. For instance pay a reasonable amount before, during and after the conduct of mining operations, as environmental bond or insurance to cover for the rehabilitation of areas that have been subjected to mining. This would help insure that funds are made available for rehabilitation work, even if the mining operators would leave. At the same time, it would be a good gauge to test if an applicant is a responsible miner since fly-by-night companies that intend to only make profits without regard to the negative consequences would be deterred to apply for mining if such bond would be required.<br /><br />All these and perhaps other innovative strategies and measures would have to be identified and undertaken soon in order to thwart the looming menace of small-scale mining in Salcedo. The fate of the people lies in the hands of the powerful few. Time is ticking, the menace grows and the onslaught continues. As we continue with our volunteer work, we just hope that things will turn out well for the people. God help us. <br /><br /><em>(Maria Cadahia Perez is a Spanish national working as a volunteer of Natural Resource Management (NRM) and Sustainable Development Planning in Salcedo, Eastern Samar. This work is written in collaboration with fellow volunteers: Judith Namata, Eldrid Madamba and Saibal Dey).</em>beautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18947565.post-1131959888918066392005-11-14T17:12:00.000+08:002005-11-14T17:20:43.463+08:00<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5986/1865/1600/CIMG4595.jpg"><img style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; CURSOR: hand" alt="" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5986/1865/320/CIMG4595.jpg" border="0" /></a><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />STATEMENT BY THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF BORONGAN ON THE LIFTING OF THE LOGGING MORATORIUM IN SAMAR ISLAND<br /><br />Beloved People of God:<br /><br />Once more we are facing a serious challenge as residents of Samar Island and as a people of faith. We stand to systematically lose again our now flourishing forest cover because the logging moratorium that has saved it since 1989 has been lifted. We cannot take this threat to the integrity of God’s creation and to the eco-system in our island lightly.<br />After a prayerful deliberation we, the Roman Catholic Bishop, the Most Rev. Leonardo Y. Medroso, D.D., and the priests of the Diocese of Borongan, raise our collective protest against the lifting of the logging moratorium in Samar Island, particularly that affecting San Jose Timber Corporation, dated August 15, 2005 and signed by Secretary Michael T. Defensor, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.<br />Our stand is not without basis. We urge our people, our non-Samareño friends and all concerned citizens to consider the following:<br /><br />1. The circumstances that led to the lifting of the moratorium had not been transparent and the process flawed. Concerned foresters, for example, question the lack of a credible field study by independent experts. Neither had there been any consultation nor public hearing on so grave a matter as the lifting of a logging moratorium that affects not only the San Jose Timber Corporation but also the lives of hundreds of thousands of Samareño Filipinos. It is likewise pointed out that the decision does not even have the endorsement of two sangguni-ans, as is required by law. Moreover, the cutting cycle ordinarily covers twenty five (25) years. There is therefore no reason why, only after 16 years, SJTC should start cutting timber.<br />2. The ninety five thousand seven hundred seventy (95,770) hectares of timber concession to the SJTC lies at the heart of the one hundred twenty thousand (120,000) hectares of old growth forest and critical watershed constituting the Samar Integrated Forest Reserve (SIFR) and the Samar Island National Park (SINP). To allow the resumption of commercial logging in these protected areas is to make a mockery of the purposes and goals of SIFR and SINP. To say that Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile and SJTC have prior rights to the old growth forest is a legal assertion. It does not reflect true justice or morality. In truth, the people of Samar have more prior rights than both.<br />3. As stewards of God’s creation people of faith must oppose the lifting of the logging moratorium as it threatens the very survival of at least 80% of Samar’s old growth forest and watershed. This, in turn, threatens our water supply and the livelihood of our farmers whose irrigation mechanisms would be in jeopardy as the watershed breaks down. Moreover, logging threatens the very survival of critical flora and fauna in the island. We cite the 2,400 species of flowering plants, with 406 Philippine endemic species and 40 endemic to Samar Island, which are in the World List of Threatened Species. We also cite the 197 bird species, 50 species being endemic to the Philippines, including the Philippine Eagle, the Philippine Hawk Eagle and the Philippine Cockatoo, not to say 39 species of mammals, 25 species of reptiles and 12 amphibian species etc. To risk the lives, livelihood and survival of these God’s creatures is not only bad governance. It also contradicts our identity and the practice of the faith. We cannot truly say we are God’s children and knowingly put ourselves and his other creatures in harm’s way.<br />4. Justice to SJTC’s rights has been raised as the principal reason for the lifting of the moratorium. It is so easy to see justice in regard to oneself and to miss justice in regard to others. The Church has always taught that the goods of the earth are meant for all (universal destination of goods). Given the history of logging and mining exploitations in Samar which have only showcased our gross social inequality and massive poverty, justice truly dictates that the natural wealth of Samar Island benefit Samar’s poor and not end up in the hands of the already wealthy few.<br />5. Pope John Paul II taught that our responsibility to protect the environment is a new field where we Christians witness to the faith (Tertio Millennio Adveniente, no. 46) and constitutes one of the “signs of hope”. That is to say that since it is the Holy Spirit that gives us hope, working to save the integrity of God’s creation is Spirit-inspired. It is the Spirit who “witnesses to our spirit that we are children of God” (Rom 8:16). But the freedom of the children of God is not only meant for them. “Indeed the whole created world eagerly awaits the revelation of the sons of God” and “will be freed from its slavery to corruption and share in the glorious freedom of the children of God” (Rom 8:19-21).<br /><br />Now we are being called to be instruments of the Spirit in extending this freedom of God’s children to our forests in Samar Island.<br /><br />May God bless us all with the courage and generosity to heed his call!<br /><br /><br />Yours in the Lord,<br /><br /><br />The Roman Catholic Bishop and Priests<br />Diocese of Boronganbeautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18947565.post-1131959172361304342005-11-14T17:02:00.000+08:002005-11-14T17:06:12.370+08:00<span style="color:#cc6600;">Diocese of Catarman<br />DCC— Bishop’s Residence<br />Catarman, Northern Samar 6100<br />Philippines<br /><br /><br />STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY<br />AGAINST MINING AND LOGGING<br /><br />Sisters and brothers in Christ:<br /><br />1. Samar Island is a very rich repository of biodiversity and considered one of the 200 eco-significant wonders of the world. There are 40 rare species of plants which can only be found in Samar. It is the home of the Philippine Eagle and 18 endangered species of mammals which are found only in the Philippines.<br /><br />2. In the past 50 years over 60% of the Island’s original forests have been lost to logging, mining, and slash and burn farming causing untold destruction to flora and fauna, accelerating soil erosion and sedimentation and causing flash floods and landslides.<br /><br />3. In 1989, the whole Catubig Valley which is the rice granary of the province of Northern Samar was inundated for a week causing the loss of 100 human lives and 100 million worth of crops. Taft River in Eastern Samar is until now dead and devoid of any marine life 10 years after the cessation of operations by the mine in Bagacay, Samar.<br /><br />4. In 1990, Pres. Corazon Aquino stopped all logging operations. In 1996, Pres. Fidel Ramos, proclaimed 347, 000 hectares of primary/closed canopy and second growth forests a protected zone. Pres. Gloria Arroyo declared 333, 300 hectares in Samar Island as a Protected Area to be known as the Samar Island Natural Park (SINP) Pursuant to RA No. 7586 or the National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS).<br /><br />5. Despite the creation of SINP, two large-scale mining companies have previously been granted permission to explore and operate inside the SINP to mine bauxite in an area that reportedly includes headwaters and old growth forest, not to mention the islands of Batag in Laoang, Northern Samar, and Manicani in Eastern Samar. In fact, GMA even ordered DENR Secretary Eliza Gozun a review of laws that have impeded the application of the 1995 Philippine Mining Act.<br /><br />6. Even while Quezon and Aurora provinces still reel from the recent horrors of the environmental tragedy that struck them, we see the influx of mining companies drawn by a government desperately strapped for cash. We are alarmed over reports that the administration is processing several applications for mining operations in Samar Island. Some logging companies are also seeking the lifting of the logging ban so they could operate again in the hinterland of Samar. The looming entry of mining and logging businesses into our province and the environmental disaster that these activities will bring on the lives of our people and our ecological patrimony, based on our national and local experiences, is of serious concern to all of us.<br /><br />7. Despite the much-touted promise of development and progress, mining and logging are nothing but curses to the rural poor. Whatever economic gains there may be cannot compensate for the depletion of irreplaceable natural resources. Who ultimately benefits from the reckless exploitation, uncontrolled destruction and wanton dissipation of our mineral and forest reserves (or what remains of it)? Certainly not our people, not the poor.<br /><br />8. DENR reported that “Samar Island is estimated to have the biggest deposit of high-grade bauxite in the country estimated to be valued at US$21 billion.” But she adds: “Per simulation conducted by the Department, however, the net present value of the direct benefits from the forests, biodiversity and their economic uses (e.g. food, medicines, water, ecotourism, ecological benefits, etc.) is estimated to be higher at US$24 billion. This does not include the direct benefits.”<br /><br />9. We, therefore, feel a grave responsibility to protect and conserve this natural patrimony. The steps that Samarnons take could well decide the shape of the future and our concern for what is happening to our environment will have a land in what we would like our future to be. This, we believe, is an essential part of our faith.<br /><br />10. We therefore support the 25-year logging moratorium and seek the cancellation of the Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSAs) and Timber Licensing Agreements (TLAs). And we stand in solidarity with all those who believe in the presentation of our natural resources and the promotion of the authentic development of people.<br /><br />11. Let us protect the dignity of the people of God! Let us promote the integrity of creation!<br /><br /><br />For the Faithful, Religious and Clergy of the Diocese of Catarman,<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> + ANGEL T. HOBAYAN, D.D.<br /> Bishop of Catarman<br /> 7 February 2005<br /> </span>beautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18947565.post-1131958802437682602005-11-14T16:58:00.000+08:002005-11-14T17:00:02.443+08:00A STATEMENT OF UTMOST CONCERN BY THE<br />CATHOLIC CLERGY OF THE DIOCESE OF CALBAYOG<br />ON THE LIFTING OF THE LOGGING MARATOTIUM IN SAMAR ISLAND IN FAVOR OF SAN JOSE TIMBER CORPORATION<br /><br /><br />Beloved People of God:<br /><br />In 1998, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) issued a pastoral letter entitled: What is happening to Our Beautiful Land? The pastoral letter expresses the anxiety of the Catholic bishops over the attack being made on the natural world which was endangering its fruitfulness over the future generations.<br /><br />This attack on our fragile environment will take centerstage yet again at the very heart of Samar Island which before was ravaged of its lush forests. The widespread and unabated logging in Samar in the 1980s was the major cause of the devastating floods and landslides in the island that have resulted in unwanted loss of human lives and misery to the thousand of Samareños.<br /><br />Thus, after a prayerful annual retreat at the Canossa House of Spirituality in Tagaytay City, we, the Roman Catholic Bishop, the Most Rev. Jose S. Palma, and the clergy of the Diocese of Calbayog, jointly protest over the unilateral lifting of the logging moratorium in Samar Island in favor of San Jose Timber Corporation. The issuance of the memorandum order duly signed by Sec. Michael T. Defensor of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), grants the SJTC the right to pursue large-scale extraction of timber resources. With its lifting however, a new ruthless threat to human lives, properties and the forests’ vast genetic diversity has begun.<br /><br />We have good reasons to oppose such lopsided pronouncement and consequently call upon our people to mull over the following facts:<br /><br />1. The issuance of a memorandum order by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources granting the SJTC the right to pursue large-scale extraction of timber resources was irregular, if not malicious. The local people were never consulted nor public hearings conducted before the ban was lifted. Still it is the local people who suffer when large-scale extraction of timber resources deplete the natural habitat, drain water and forest resources, and flood lowland communities. Mater et Magistra # 55 says that the “local people are in the best position to decide on development strategies that best respond to their needs and conditions”.<br /><br />2. The memorandum order states that a “multi-sectoral group composed of representatives of the local government, the Catholic Church, foresters and DENR officials submitted a Report on their comprehensive study of the area covered by TLA no. 118 unanimously recommending the lifting of the logging moratorium. However, the fact is that the priest-representative from the Catholic Church did not affix his own signature in the space provided for. Surprisingly though, somebody else’s name appears therein.<br /><br />3. The memorandum order granting the SJTC the right to pursue commercial logging inside the Samar Island Natural Park (Presidential Proclamation 442) deliberately derides the very essence of a ‘protected area’. The management zones in the existing Initial Protected Area Plan (IPAP) and the draft Management Plan of SINP clearly indicate that the area claimed by San Jose Timber Corporation (SJTC) would not allow for any commercial logging primarily because this is the headwaters of at least 25 major river systems draining out to the three (3) provinces of Samar Island. Apart from this fact that the area claimed by SJTC is composed of old growth forest, where logging is absolutely prohibited.<br /><br />4. The unique biophysical characteristics of Samar’s forests explicate the need for its protection because Samar is among the areas with the highest rainfall in the country. The watershed areas of major rivers receive up to 5, 000 mm of rainfall per year. When such rain is concentrated on an area, the runoff results in severe flooding. Therefore, the more rainfall area receives, the more such area need its trees. Furthermore, 58% if the Samar land area is steeper than 25% slope. Steep slopes lead the erosion but steeper slopes lead to landslides. Thus, logging in steeper slopes is too perilous for communities downstream.<br /><br /> 5. The SINP is the longest contiguous lowland tropical forest in the Philippines. It is one of the 200 Eco-Regions (high biodiversity and rate of endemism) in the world vital in preserving the earth’s biodiversity. It is one of the 18 Centers of Plant Diversity and one of the 9 Endemic Bird Areas in the Philippines. It is envisaged to provide security and land tenure to at least 200, 000 upland dwellers and help reduce poverty thorough sustainable farming systems. However, its richness and potentials as a center of the island’s development will disappear because of a ‘prior right of one man— en. Juan Ponce Enrile. This is injustice plain and simple. The truth of the of the matter is that the Samarnons have more prior rights over the resources of the island.<br /><br /> 6. SJTC invokes the clause on ‘prior rights’ for the extraction or utilization of natural resources and justify the resumption of logging in Samar Island. The firm however regards such right as absolute. But in truth, the ‘right’ accorded to him by government is a mere ‘privilege’ which could be recalled when the common good is at stake. The Church teaches thus, (Church in the Modern World # 69) “God destined the earth and all it contains for all people and nations so that all created things would be shared fairly by all humankind under the guidance of justice tempered by charity.” Furthermore, Popuiorum Progression # 69 reminds us: “God destined the earth with all that it contains for the use of all peoples and nations, in such a way that created things in fair share should accrue to all peoples under the leadership of justice with charity as a companion.”<br /> We must therefore remember that the forests are not just trees for timber but a rich tapestry of interrelationships that make up an ecosystem. This ecosystem in turn nourishes people, feeds communities and sustains the food chain.<br /><br /><br /> May God bless our efforts with His grace of peace.<br /><br /> <br /> Sincerely,<br /><br /> His Excellency the Roman Catholic Bishop and the<br /> Clergy of the Diocese of Calbayog, Samar,<br /> Philippinesbeautiful samarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17867122097317277960noreply@blogger.com0